<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost in Translation: Primary Care in the Perilous Game of GME Redistribution and Expansion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicaleducationfutures.org/blog/2009/12/lost-in-translation-primary-care-in-the-perilous-game-of-gme-redistribution-and-expansion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicaleducationfutures.org/blog/2009/12/lost-in-translation-primary-care-in-the-perilous-game-of-gme-redistribution-and-expansion/</link>
	<description>Essential Health Policy News for Med School Educators and Students</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Azuma, MPH</title>
		<link>http://medicaleducationfutures.org/blog/2009/12/lost-in-translation-primary-care-in-the-perilous-game-of-gme-redistribution-and-expansion/#comment-5936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Azuma, MPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicaleducationfutures.org/blog/?p=174#comment-5936</guid>
		<description>Very well said. No matter what your personal position is on this debate, we are well beyond the point were we need serious evidence-based discussion on how to reform our system.  And while we could start to examine our quagmire from many different points of view, the issue of physician graduate education may be one of the most powerful drivers in bringing about positive change.  Another thoughtful commentary of this point

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/27/epperly.doctors/index.html 

references an indespensible article 

Baicker, K., &#38; Chandra, A. (2009). Cooper's Analysis Is Incorrect. Health Aff, 28(1), w116-118) 

that is part of a must read scientific dialogue on the subject.  

The time for kneejerk policy making is over.  We must question our deepest assumptions and pay due diligence to the findings that less may in fact be more...more affordable and with more quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said. No matter what your personal position is on this debate, we are well beyond the point were we need serious evidence-based discussion on how to reform our system.  And while we could start to examine our quagmire from many different points of view, the issue of physician graduate education may be one of the most powerful drivers in bringing about positive change.  Another thoughtful commentary of this point</p>
<p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/27/epperly.doctors/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/27/epperly.doctors/index.html</a> </p>
<p>references an indespensible article </p>
<p>Baicker, K., &amp; Chandra, A. (2009). Cooper&#8217;s Analysis Is Incorrect. Health Aff, 28(1), w116-118) </p>
<p>that is part of a must read scientific dialogue on the subject.  </p>
<p>The time for kneejerk policy making is over.  We must question our deepest assumptions and pay due diligence to the findings that less may in fact be more&#8230;more affordable and with more quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
